BLAME IT ALSO ON THE LACK OF PAROLE SEARCHES, ETC.

I am still peeved at why Jaycee Dugard was not rescued years earlier. It's called not doing their job. It's not doing their due dilligence. Phillip Garrido had a back yard. He was a parolee. When on Probation or Parole, he or she cannot demand to see a warrant, signed by a Judge, and probable cause or not, the police have a license to search the premises at will. Why? To accept the terms of one's Probation or Parole, the defendant has to waive some of his or her constitutional rights that everybody else has before being released. If the person has committed a crime while on Probation or Parole, the peace officer(s) have to intervene before further crimes are committed. If there are crimes or other violations, the Probation or Parole can be revoked, and if on Probation, he or she is brought before a Judge, and he could send the defendant back to jail or prison. If on Parole, the prisoner can be sent back to Prison under California law up to a year without seeing a Judge.

Parole officers, Sheriff's Deputies, and County Code Enforcement Officers could have stepped right in and searched without a warrant, and Garrido would have been in jail as early as 1991! I do apologize to Antioch Police and Antioch Code Enforcement Officers, since it has been learned that Garrido's house is not in Antioch City Limits; however, the Antioch City Council should be blamed for not annexing that unincorporated area. If annexed, that area could have been more safe, and Jaycee could have been freed years earlier.

I also stated in an earlier post that Garrido should have remained in Federal Prison and did at least two-thirds of his time. The fault should be on the U. S. Parole Commission, nearly all Reagan appointees, for letting him get out after spending 35 minutes with Garrido. Unfortunately, more conservatives will demand more restrictions like Jessica's Law, and further ramp up these perverts.

Now, I am a liberal, but I see no point in defending Phillip Garrido. As to Nancy, she should get less than Phillip, but not that less. She was seen snatching Jaycee, along with Phillip, so she should get no less, but as for the rapes, unless she was "holding down" Jaycee, she should testify against Phillip, if she wants any years off her sentence. Phillip would not even let Nancy talk to her family in person or on the phone. In some ways she was also a victim as much as a perpetrator. 

I am in favor of monitoring and victim and parent notification, but to restrict these assholes on where they can live didn't stop Garrido. It was the Parole Commission that let him out early. It didn't stop Garrido from moving up and down Interstate 80 trolling for victims. When Garrido was living in unincorprated Antioch, he was living in a neighborhood of child molestors. As for parole searches, the State and the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office dropped the soap. In order to prevent more victims, and the fact that some of these sex offenders are parolees, then have one question for State and Federal Parole Officers:

WHEN THE FUCK ARE THE PAROLE OFFICERS GOING TO DO PERIODIC PAROLE SEARCHES?!!!

If the complaint is "we don't have the money in the State Budget for this", I have a solution:

RAISE TAXES!  

If you need more police protection? RAISE TAXES!
If you need more fire protecton? (Yes, we had fires lately.) RAISE TAXES!
If you need more prisons? RAISE TAXES!

DON'T RAISE TAXES?!!! Then conservative voters and politicians can join Sarah Palin--ON AN ICEBERG, AND DRIFT TO SEA! We don't need stupid laws, and no provision for more taxes to pay for the enforcement of new laws. Portions of Jessica's Law should be repealed in that restricting the perverts on where they live doesn't stop them. 

It didn't stop Phillip Garrido!    

BLAME IT ON RAY-GUN!

"Phillip Garrido, the man accused of kidnapping and sexually assaulting Jaycee Lee Dugard, was paroled by the federal government two decades ago after a 35-minute jailhouse interview in which he spoke of his crime, his prison experience and future plans, the U.S. Parole Commission said Friday."--Maura Dolan, "Federal parole officials released Phillip Garrido from 50-year sentence after short interview", Los Angeles Times, September 4, 2009.

The U.S. Parole Commission in 1988 was probably stacked with Reagan appointees.

They only used 35 minutes.

They didn't get the Trial Transcripts.

They didn't the Police and Psychiatric Reports showing the propensity for Garrido to commit sex crimes.

They just let him be transferred to a Nevada State Prison in 1988.

With the scant record, the Commission made the stupid assumptions:

"Oh, he's married."

"Oh, he's a model prisoner."

"Oh, he earned a diploma."

"Oh, he'll take care of his mama when he get's out."

His mother is senile, and probably did not know what the hell was going on.

He probably raped his mother too.

HE IS A MASTER MANIPULATOR!

He was probably taught by other inmates at Leavenworth (Yes, the Federal Prison in Kansas) how to game the system, and how to do acts to get out early. Of course, he would have to be a good "model" prisoner, meaning he can't do things, such as attack the guards, or attack other prisoners. But to also get out early, he got married to Nancy, a relative of a fellow prisoner. He also used Mrs. Garrido, the senile mother, as an excuse to plead for mercy, telling the Feds, "I'll take care of her". Yeah, and he probably fucked his mother after he got out too.

There were people who believed that Garrido would do his actual time of 50 years for kidnapping his rape victim across State lines. There was 1) his Federal Judge, 2) the U.S. Attorney's Office in Reno, Nevada, 3) his State Judge, 4) the Reno District Attorney's Office, 5) his victim, and of course maybe others, like his father, who probably believed he wouldn't see his son free and alive again.

If 50 years was a California sentence, Garrido would have to do two-thirds, or 33 1/3 years and be released in 2010. "Early Release", if entitled to it, would mean 25 years, or 2002. To release him in 11 years, based on only 35 minutes with him, is dumb, stupid, idiotic, assinine, shitty, and comes into the category of "what the fuck?!!"

Remember, these were Reagan appointees, the "law and order" types. In California, parole hearings are PUBLIC. If the inmate is indigent, he/she gets a Court-appointed attorney, and most of the time, parole is denied. Hell, Manson Family member Susan Atkins was denied parole despite suffering from terminal brain cancer. It might be inhumane, but so was removing Sharon Tate's abdomen, and letting her bloody (literally) body and her baby die on her floor.

The U.S. Parole Commission really sat on it. By giving Garrido parole only after 11 years based on a 35-minute interview, it gave every woman and child the sentence of being subject to being held prisoner, being brainwashed, being molested, being penetrated, and to death. So much for "law and order".

I don't believe in what Manuel Garrido stating that it was "drugs" that caused his son to be a pervert. His son is still crazy today. Garrido is probably suffering from bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. He doesn't care. Either he best care or you throw him in and throw away the key.