BOYCOT ARIZONA NEWS FEED

Loading...

A call to action

A call to action
If you don't like the picture, BITE ME!

Monday, March 8, 2010

A LETTER I SENT TO REGION IV OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION

I sent this letter to Kenneth Ford, Region IV Director of the California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (at Kenneth.Ford@cdcr.ca.gov), to see if the public can get further information on this Gardner asshole:

Mr. Ford,
I am running a website called Hank's Legal Corner (hankram.blogspot.com), and I would like to request the complete Parole Records of John Albert Gardner III.
In light of what happened in the arrest of Phillip Garrido who kidnapped and raped Jane Doe [Jaycee Lee Dugard] for 18 years, and the lack of extensive supervision of Garrido who was supposedly supervised for 10 years, I have questions as to why Gardner was:
1. Supposed to be living in Lake Elsinore or Escondido, but was either "visiting" his mother, or trolling for victims.
2. Was supposed to be at Atascedero State Hospital for at least 2005-2007.
and
3. Was supposed to receive mental health services, since he was known to have bipolar disorder.
I am also wondering if he got the "low-level" treatment he got that Garrido also got. A Court-appointed psychiatrist said Gardner was supposed to get 30 years, and if so, did you receive the report, or did you guys also guessed like in the Garrido case?
Please send me a copy of Gardner's Parole Records. I know he is in the San Diego County Jail, and I'm not spending a lot of money to go to his mother's house and harass her. If she needs privacy, please blackout her address.
Thank you for your anticipated cooperation,
Hank Ramey,


hankram.blogspot.com

*************************************************
Let's hope they don't try to stonewall, like they tried to do in the Garrido case.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

SOUNDS LIKE JARRED HARRELL HAS BEEN ABUSED TOO?

It doesn't excuse what he allegedly did to Somer Thompson.

As stated in www.jacksonville.com:


"Research over the decades has established a profile for people who are perversely attracted to children. Often they've been raised in non-traditional environments or experienced a childhood trauma, Finkelhor said.

"As a result, they often didn't have productive relationships with their peers. Court records have shown that Harrell was raised in a bizarre environment with several different stepfathers, including one who publicly declared that he had married Harrell's then-8-year-old sister.

"Another stepfather has said he found pornographic images of children in a locked box in Harrell's room when he was 16. The girls in the picture were under 6 years old - about the same age as the girls investigators found pictured on Harrell's computer."

ABUSE BEGATS ABUSE! HELLO?!!!

True, if Harrell is actually guilty of murdering Somer, he should get to sit in Old Smokey or something similar. The fact is that if somebody helped Harrell cope with the abuse, and if the Police ARRESTED HIM SOONER for having the kiddie porn on his computer, Somer would still be alive today. Second of all, isn't it a crime to have kiddie porn on the computer? If so, Harrell should have been arrested before he had met Somer (if that is proven to be the case), but first, both the kiddie porn and the alleged murder have it's roots in the "bizzare childhood".

First of all, nobody marries an 8-year old. If that was the case, Harrell should have been in foster care or be sent back to his birth father. Stupidity alone is not a reason to take a child away from the parents, but when one marries an animal who physically and/or sexually abuses your child, you're a sick bitch or son of a bitch, like Nancy Garrido. Somebody, A LONG TIME AGO should have counseled Harrell as a child before his trauma graduated to kiddie porn, molesting, and murder. 

I believe that John Albert Gardner III also was abused as a child. I also believe that the notorious California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation also did not properly supervise Gardner either. How come he didn't spend two years at Atascadero State Hospital as required by law before Jessica's Law went into effect? Since he was also Bipolar, was he given a mental health screening, or do did they drop the ball like they did with Phillip Garrido?

We don't need more Laws with names like Megan, Jessica, and Marsy. If we don't get into root causes, I don't give a fuck how nice and manicured your lawn looks. Your child will always be in danger until we stop begating abuse!

Saturday, March 6, 2010

COMMENTS ON THE COMMENTS OF THE JAYCEE VIDEO

I have seen the Dugard Family Video today on Good Morning America, 20/20, and Nightline. I am glad that Jaycee Dugard is getting better, and that I hope she continues to heal for her sake and her two daughters.

Her mother wants the Paparazzi to stop stalking them. THE DUGARD FAMILY ARE NOT FREAKS ESCAPED FROM A CIRCUS TENT! If the assholes from the Star, the National Enquirer, the Globe, the News of the World, the Sun, Fama, or what the fuck supermarket/afternoon tabloid that's published want news? Fine! Go find Divine Brown and go fuck her and yourselves. In fact, wrap yourself with a millstone and go drown yourselves in the ocean.

In an interview with KCRA-TV, Nancy Garrido's attorney, Stephen Tapson, finally admits that her husband, Phil, is looney, to wit:

"'He's looney tunes. There's no question about it whether it's legal looney tunes or not is another question. In my view maybe he's crazier than a hoot owl but he's still able to manipulate people … as he did before,' Tapson said."

Fine, Tapson. Plead Nancy out YESTERDAY, get a little lighter sentence, and make her testify against Phil. If Nancy doesn't want to do it, do it for the Bocanegra family. O. K., I don't believe that the Jehovah's Witness faith, but her family is all she has LEFT! If Wanda Barzee could testify against Brian Mitchell, then Nancy Garrido must do the same. She would not get approval from places like the California Institution for Women at Frontera if she "stood by her man", a rapist and child molester. 

Thursday, March 4, 2010

61 MORE MURDERS? IT'S TIME FOR DONOUGHT-EATING PIGS TO GET OFF THE DON IMUS SYNDROME

After Anthony Sowell was caught with 10 bodies and a head in Cleveland, there are now reports of the deaths or disappearances of 61 women, nearly all Black. These women would have been saved if Sowell was caught sooner, and they quit thinking like Mark & Brian of KLOS-FM or FOX Business Host Don Imus. Imus used to have a show on Westwood One Radio, and MSNBC called "Imus in the Morning". He was fired by Westwood One and NBC for referring to a girls basketball team that included Whites and Blacks as "n---y headed h-s". H- is a slang word in the ghetto that is short for WHORE, which if one was a White racist, you would believe that Black women are junkie welfare moms who prostitute their ass for a living.

The women were killed by Sowell, even they were on drugs, and/or were prostitutes.

Where are the 61 missing women? Hmm?

Were the Police making copies of "Birth of a Nation"? Or did they form a secret Nazi club at the Station, because they or their parents believe that Blacks must still be treated as second-class citizens despite the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other civil rights laws and Court decisions?

Cities can go bankrupt because of a policy of a "failure to train". HELLLO?!!!

The Cleveland Police must find those 61 women YESTERDAY as though she was Mrs. Obama or Mrs. Biden. HELLO?!!! Otherwise, they should have recalls in the City of Cleveland, and some heads should figuratively roll. What good is a Police Department if they don't enforce the law? HELLO?!!!

EXPERTS: PREDATOR LAWS NOT WORKING (HELL, I COULD HAVE TOLD YOU THAT!)

[ UPDATE: In the Comments to this Entry, I said that Santa Clarita City Council candidate Johnny Pride was arrested. The Sheriff's had him released because the D. A.'s Office said that there was insufficient evidence. It does not mean he can't be re-arrested. There's just not enough to try him.]

From the San Diego Union-Tribune:

Experts: Predator laws not working



By Jeff McDonald, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER


Wednesday, March 3, 2010 at 11:13 p.m.


The crimes are horrible enough to outrage even the most impassive observers: a popular teen murdered and buried off a lakefront jogging trail, a young girl lured to her death by a predator with the promise of a puppy.


Human nature all but mandates that something be done to prevent others from suffering the fate of Chelsea King or Megan Kanka, the 7-year-old New Jersey girl now remembered as the Megan in Megan’s Law.


Calls to action already are ringing across San Diego County and the nation for tougher legislation after the rape and murder of 17-year-old Chelsea, whose body is believed to have been found near Lake Hodges on Tuesday and whose accused killer appeared in court Wednesday to answer the charges.


But legal experts note that California already has a litany of laws named after child victims adopted in the heated aftermath of terrible crimes. Too often, the rules fail to deter pedophiles and other sexual offenders who may never be reformed.


“Virtually every study done of the subject has concluded that Megan’s Law hasn’t reduced sex offenses,” said Shaun Martin, a law professor at the University of San Diego. “So it’s pretty clear at this point that the law doesn’t reduce crime.”


Karen Doll-Murphy of Escondido was so disgusted by the inability to effectively police sexual predators after they are paroled that she launched a Facebook page to lobby for a new law to lock them up for life after a single conviction. By evening, it had more than 800 members and was growing by the minute.


“We the people must stand united together in a nationwide effort to change legislation that protects our children, not their predators,” she wrote.


Elected officials joined the debate just as quickly.


At San Diego City Hall, Councilman Carl DeMaio, who represents the Rancho Bernardo area where Chelsea King’s car was found after she went missing, huddled with advisers to discuss what his office might do to better protect constituents. In Sacramento, Assemblyman Nathan Fletcher, R-San Diego, said he was already examining possible legislation in response to Chelsea’s murder.


“Our laws are supposed to protect the innocent, but they didn’t protect Chelsea King,” said Fletcher, who urged people to pray for Chelsea’s family on his state Web site.


The best-known statutes aimed at protecting children from sexual predators are Megan’s Law and Jessica’s Law, referring to state laws advocated by people appalled at the murders — years apart and in different states — of two young girls.


In 1994, Megan was sexually assaulted and killed by a previous offender in Hamilton Township, N.J., who coaxed her into his house with talk of a new puppy. Megan’s parents said they had no idea the former convict had moved in nearby, and the crime prompted state lawmakers to require sex offenders to alert local police whenever they move to a new town. Two years later, Congress required all states to create a registry of offenders.


John Albert Gardner III, the suspect in Chelsea’s case, was paroled in 2005 after a child-molestation conviction and was registered at his grandmother’s home in Lake Elsinore. He also alerted police in Escondido, where he had rented an apartment.


“That (Megan’s Law) didn’t help,” said Melissa Holiday, president of the Parent Teacher Student Association at Poway High School, where Chelsea would have graduated this year. “He didn’t live here. He was visiting family.”


After 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford was abducted from her home in Homosassa, Fla., by a convicted sex offender in 2005, state residents demanded and lawmakers enacted a law mandating 25-year prison terms and lifetime electronic monitoring for defendants convicted of lewd and lascivious acts against a child under 12.


For California’s version of Jessica’s Law, convicted sex offenders are not allowed to live within 2,000 feet of a school or park, although the restriction has been challenged on constitutional grounds.


One of the ideas Fletcher floated Wednesday was to study whether the California law should be extended to prohibit convicted sex offenders from even loitering within 2,000 feet of a school, park or other places where children congregate.


But if policymakers want to stop sexual predators more effectively, said Andrew Vachss, a New York lawyer and author who represents children in court, they should boost funding for child-welfare and other government services so that abused children do not grow into abusers.


“Every time a kid gets killed there’s a demand for new laws,” said Vachss, who has written extensively on the failure of legislation such as Megan’s Law. “We don’t put any of our money into interdicting the process by which monsters are made.”


Brian Adams, a San Diego State University political science professor, said he doubts any elected official these days will seriously pursue a new law to protect children if it costs much money because so many government agencies are struggling to balance budgets.


“Up until a year or two ago, politicians were falling over themselves to be tough on crime and tough on sex offenders,” Adams said. “Now, with the budget crisis, politicians are a little more hesitant to get longer sentences and put more restrictions on (convicts) because it means more costs to the state.”


Meanwhile, efforts to expand the use of electronic tracking systems for sex offenders have run into legal, jurisdictional and financial disputes.


Several states are wrestling with the constitutionality of added penalties that lawmakers began placing on “sexually violent predators” in the 1990s. Those rules allow certain convicts to be held in a state hospital — after completing their prison term — if the government says they are still a threat to society.


The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing that question now, said constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky, founding dean at the University of California Irvine School of Law.


“It worries me that once somebody has served their sentence they can continue to be incarcerated, but unless we’re going to go to life without parole for sex offenders or sentences that are decades long, there’s not really a way we can solve this,” he said. “I think everybody wants solutions, but I’m not sure anybody has them.”


Jeff McDonald: (619) 542-4585; jeff.mcdonald@uniontrib.com


Staff writers Michael Gardner and Peter Rowe contributed to this report. [Emphasis added.]

***********************************************
Here, the experts now claim in part as to what we need to do. STOP BEGATING ABUSE! Now there are calls for "life without parole" setences for these molestors. It doesn't stop future molestors!

Until you stop those who were victimized, and later turn angry and abuse and molest, YOU DIDN'T STOP SHIT! You just made a decision to jail future generations because you thought of only today, but not tomorrow.

Remember, Brian David Mitchell, Phillip Garrido, etc., have been abused by one or more caretakers. Simply jailing them or putting them to death will not stop future abuse. Until you do, your child will always be in danger.

Just because places like Watts or East L. A. are bad neighborhoods doesn't mean your child is safe in your $500,000 home in some far out condo community somewhere. It's time for rational thinking, even though Mitchell, Garrido, and assholes like John Albert Gardner III need to have their asses impaled. Until we stop the begatting, one's son or daughter may not be back tonight.

THAT'S A CRYING SHAME!


Wednesday, March 3, 2010

AT LEAST JUDGE KIMBALL GOT IT RIGHT; MITCHELL WILL STAND TRIAL; INSERT LAW & ORDER: SVU THEME HERE

Two days ago, Judge Dale Kimball of the Salt Lake City Federal Court ruled that Brian David Mitchell is sane, and that he will stand trial for his alleged guilt. 

The problem with why it finally took so long is because of the Utah Court System. Even though most politicians in Utah are the "law & order" types, the Judges, since the territorial days between 1847 and 1896 have been more merciful than in states like California or in the extreme, Texas, due to the fact that most of the Judges are Mormon. But then again, Mormons in Utah have not always trusted government, and in Mitchell's case, before the McMartin case was filed in 1982, if a Mormon was accused by another Mormon of sexual abuse, it was left to the accused local Bishop and his Counselors, and unless the member could show that he could repent (like make amends), he or she was excommunicated, unless the male member was an Elder or above, then that person could only be disfellowshiped, until the local Stake President, his Counselors, and the Stake High Council heard the member's case, and if the member could not demonstrate repentance, he was then excommunicated. After the McMartin Case was filed in California, it was easier for civil prosecutors to try these predators in Utah, as well as elsewhere.

The competency case for Mitchell was different in Federal Court.  In California Courts, the defendant has to be shown that he did not know right from wrong in order to be found incompetent. What the Federal did was hear mostly from lay witnesses as to how Mitchell acted and reacted throughout his life.

In the Order, Judge Kimball states:

1. That when Mitchell and Wanda Barzee had her for nine months, Mitchell knew what he was doing, concealed Elizabeth's face, didn't act like a "man of God" (wasn't charitable), made justifications for raping Elizabeth daily (surprised that she did get pregnant with this bastard), etc.; in other words, use of religion was a farce. Mitchell used God just to rape Elizabeth.

2. That Mitchell had a sexual problem, since he was a teenager. I'LL GO EVEN FARTHER THAN THAT. Mitchell's actions are of a result of him being molested and raped by his father when he was a child. Why would he force a four-year old girl to touch his dick? Why would he get his girlfriend pregnant (not a sole factor, but cumulative with the rest of his family life)? Why would he physically abuse his kids? Why kidnap his kids and take them back east with them?Why would he refuse to marry in the Temple with his second wife? Why would he molest all five kids in his second marriage, including the two youngest ones, where Mitchell masturbated his three-year old son, and "hurted" his one-year old daughter's privates? Why would Mitchell kill the dog, and later feed the kids their daughter's rabbit for dinner and called it chicken? (I DETEST WHAT MITCHELL AND BARZEE DID WITH THEIR DAUGHTER'S RABBIT! When my sainted mother grew up in Utah, she had to eat rabbits for dinner, and was told it tasted like chicken. Why? BECAUSE EVERYBODY WAS STARVING DURING THE GREAT DEPRESSION! Her mom and others couldn't afford to buy chicken at the market, so they had to get food somewhere!) Finally, why live like the bums? Reason, they wanted to act like that tax cheat that shoved a plane to the IRS building in Austin, Texas. Mitchell and Barzee didn't want to pay taxes and child support.

3. That Mitchell knew how the legal system worked. He knew that his acts were illegal, which is why Elizabeth was forced to wear a Muslim outfit. He sounded very competent when he was arrested in the San Diego area. When he failed to have the State drop the sex charge in Elizabeth's kidnapping that's when he started singing in Court. When he was at Utah State Hospital, he watched "Charmed". That series on the old WB Network starred Rose McGowan, Alyssa Milano, and Holly Marie Combs, and in its first season, it also starred Shannon Doherty. Now, imagine them scantily-clad on "Charmed". Now, imagine each of them butt-naked.

ENOUGH SAID!

Brian David Mitchell suffers not from a mental illness, but from a sex addiction brought on by his father's pedophilia. No, Bill Maher, there is such a thing, and it has nothing to do with Dr. Drew Pinsky treating Andy Dick. The reason why Mitchell has sexually abused children and others, is not because he "loves" or lusts for them. He abuses them, because he didn't like the way his hand was drawn when he was born, and later when his dad first molested him. He doesn't want to see happy kids, because Mitchell isn't happy. I remember an interview between Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, and the late Ted Bundy, and Bundy claimed to Dobson that Bundy became a serial killer because of pornography. I believe that is partly true. The real truth is that Bundy's grandfather molested him. That is the real reason. ABUSE BEGATS ABUSE! 

It is the same reason why Richard Allen Davis killed Polly Klaas.

It is the same reason why Joseph Edward Duncan III killed Anthony Martinez, and most of Shasta Groene's family.

It is the same reason why that child pornographer killed Somer Thompson.

It is probably why John Albert Gardner III killed Chelsea King.

It is also probably why Phillip Garrido kidnapped and raped Jaycee Dugard and kept her hostage for 18 years. 

The reason why there are child predators is because a parent, relative, teacher, or priest (or somebody in a similar capacity) molested and abused a child, and instead of the child turned into the proper direction, the child later becomes an angry adult, who inflicts more pain on a child than what he got as a child. 

Ultimately, Mitchell probably wasn't in General Conference when then-Elder Boyd K. Packer first talked about self-control in the mid-1970's. Mitchell was probably 21 in about 1974 when Elder Packer was ordained to the Quorum of the Twelve. His talk was later made into a filmstrip, videotaped, and republished in tracts, such as "Strength for the Youth". Then when Mitchell was convicted as a juvenile in 1968, the President of the LDS Church was David O. McKay. Apostles in that year included, Mark E. Petersen, Joseph Fielding Smith, Harold B. Lee, Spencer W. Kimball, Ezra Taft Benson, Howard W. Hunter, Gordon B. Hinckley, and Thomas S. Monson. The last seven succeeded President McKay. Presidents Kimball, Hunter, and Hinckley also spoke against pornography during their lifetime. Where was Mitchell?!!!

Mitchell used God and His Church only as a stepping-stone for "higher" power. When he didn't get it, he started his own sect, wrote his own scripture, but it wasn't because he didn't like what Presidents Hunter and Hinckley taught from the pulpit. He lived a sexual sado-masochistic lifestyle in the home, because he lacked self-control at the home, something President Packer of the Quorum of the Twelve has taught for years. He wasn't interested in making himself happy or his family. He was interested in only making everybody miserable. He didn't go to the poor areas of Salt Lake City and try to start his "Seven Plus One" polygamous family. Mitchell chose a 14-year old girl, living a happy life in the Federal Hill area of Salt Lake City (a place like Redlands or the Westwood area of L. A.) he seen while working at Ed Smart's house as a handyman. That's when, as Elvie Montana would say, a "real contribution to human history". 

The real reason why he wants to sing hymns in Court is so that he can go back to Utah State Hospital and watch shows, like "Charmed". His planned rouse didn't work. In fact, he's not crazy at all. The reason why he made Elizabeth wear a Muslim outfit, is because he didn't want to be caught. He knew he was going to commit a crime, but having Elizabeth in street clothes, would have made him be caught sooner. His defense wouldn't work in California, Texas, and almost any other State. Instead of taking the plea deal in a Utah Court, Mitchell would have to face Judge Mitchell, and either take a Federal deal or all chips are off the table, and Mitchell would be tried for all the marbles. Unless he gets a "Supermax" cell in Florence, Colorado, Mitchell may end up with his Big Bubba Johnson cellmate, and he may be White as a playing card deck. Then if he meets a Polynesian inmate, he wouldn't need to unzip or use a shank, he could kill Mitchell with his bare hands. Then again, his cellmate might even be Phillip Garrido himself. (NOTE: he had kidnapped Jaycee while on Federal Parole. The Feds may require that Garrido serve all the remaining 39 years from the 1977 kidnapping conviction, and do the entire time, before he does any State time.)

As for solutions, instead of killing all the pedophiles or giving them all "life without parole" we should work with the victims before they become pedophiles themselves. I fear that the then-three-year old boy in Mitchell's second marriage would be a pedophile, because he wasn't able to control himself, and may use all of that bottled up anger to strike back. I'm afraid it would take more than just listening to Pres. Packer's talk on self-control. If we as a society do not work with the victims, the victims would come back to haunt us with a vengence.

Ask Jaycee Dugard.

Ask Mr. King.

Ask Mark Klaas.

Ask Ed Smart.

Ask John Walsh.

Insert the Law & Order: SVU theme here.

  

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

JAYCEE SHOULD SUE THE FLYING FUCK OUT OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, PART II, AND CHELSEA KING 1993-2010

Jaycee Dugard's claim and that of her mother and two daughters are still in the news. I still hope that after more psychological wounds heal that they decide to file suit.

After today, they may have to file suit sooner.

In the Rancho Bernardo area of San Diego, they may have found the body of missing teen Chelsea King. The alleged suspect is John Albert Gardner III, who was found with damped pants on. More importantly, he served five of his six years in State Prison, and was on Parole until 2008. While on Parole, California voters voted yes on Proposition 83, the other name for Jessica's Law in this State. In the California Supreme Court case of In re E. J., handed down last February 1, the State Supreme Court ruled that the 2,000-feet buffer zone around parks and schools applies to all Parolees and Registered Sex Offenders when the measure was passed in 2006. 

According to http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Jessica's_Law,_California_Proposition_83_(2006), there is a startling statement about the law:

"A study released in November 2009 said that more than 70 percent of registered sex offenders in San Diego County are violating the provisions of the law."  (From San Diego Union Tribune, "One last word on sex offenders", November 30, 2009.)

Ironically, the cunt that co-authored Proposition 83 was San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis. She thinks that the new law would help keep sex offenders away from kids.

Let's see:

1. It didn't help Chelsea King. If her body was found in that shallow grave today, Gardner was "visiting" his mother's house in the Rancho Bernardo area near a school. His registration said that he lived in Lake Elsinore in Riverside County. Why wasn't he there? Nevertheless, Jessica's Law didn't work in Dumanis' County. I feel very sorry for the King Family.

2. It didn't and wouldn't help Jaycee or her two kids. When they put an ankle bracelet and the traveling restriction on Phillip Garrido, they didn't ding him or sent him back to State Prison for going outside of the 25-mile limit. He also lied to his Parole Officer, and said that one of Jaycee's daughters he fathered was his "niece". Even if Phil had a niece, he wasn't supposed to have any kids with him. Albeit, he lived outside the 2,000-feet barrier in unincorporated Antioch, it didn't stop him from going to South Lake Tahoe, about 500 miles away, and the scene of his 1976 crime of kidnapping Katie Callaway Hall, to kidnap Jaycee, even if Jessica's Law was in effect back in 1991.

3. If the law was enacted in Utah, it wouldn't stop Brian David Mitchell from kidnapping Elizabeth Smart, other than a sex-related conviction as a juvenile, he wasn't convicted of any other sex crimes, despite his behavior. I also don't believe that Utah required him to register as a sex offender in 1968 at the time he was convicted as a juvenile. He has been engaged in predatory behaviors since he was a kid, but Jessica's law wouldn't stop him in 2002.

4. Finally, in Florida of all places, the birth of Jessica's Law in the first place, it didn't save Somer Thompson. She was murdered, allegedly, by a person engaged in kiddie porn, but he was not convicted of any sex crimes. In fact, the cops took away his computer days before Somer disappeared and was killed. It didn't help save Somer, and nothing stopped her alleged killer from murdering her in the first place.

Jessica's Law also would had not helped Polly Klaas, Samantha Runnion, Anthony Martinez, and not even Adam Walsh. Predators are still going to be around children, and they're not in trenchcoats. They will still be anywhere, and they will still kidnap, molest, and even kill their helpless victim. Even the ankle bracelet they put on Phil didn't stop Phil from moving around and visiting UC Berkeley the day two UC cops stopped Phil, so why have Jessica's Law if you're not going to enforce it? Jessica's Law might as well be re-named "words on used toilet paper".

If the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation did not re-arrest Gardner for violating any restrictions, it's time for Jaycee and her mom to come out in public, file suit against the State and the Parole Officers involved, and address why the State of Calibogus didn't protect Chelsea King from being killed.

If I was in San Diego County, fucking Dunamis should be recalled!