BOYCOT ARIZONA NEWS FEED

Loading...

A call to action

A call to action
If you don't like the picture, BITE ME!

Monday, November 30, 2009

EXCUSE ME WHILE I ACCEPT THE DANIEL DAY LEWIS AWARD FOR BEING A CRYBABY

In the movie, "Gangs of New York", Daniel Day Lewis plays William Cutting, the "Butcher". When Amsterdam Valen, played by Leonardo Di Caprio, put a dead rabbit on the fence signifying the return of the Dead Rabbits gang, Cutting was crying like a baby , and wanted the death penalty for whoever killed the next rabbit.

I do have sympathy for Mitchell's daughter and her pet rabbit. Clearly, Mitchell and his wife Wanda Barzee, hated their kids. They didn't like their own selves so they caught on to the kid, and fed her her pet rabbit.

Barzee was clearly crazy. Mitchell had a unhappy childhood, so he made his kids experience unhappiness. 

Mitchell also molested his kids. Sex crimes are a misnomer. Molestation is not an act of love, but an act of violence. It's time to call a spade a spade. Mitchell made his kids unhappy, because he was deprived of unhappiness.

He can make all of us happy by pleading guilty, and serving his time.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

MITCHELL, LIKE GARRIDO IS A MASTER MANIPULATOR

From Fox 13 News:

"SALT LAKE CITY - The accused kidnapper of Elizabeth Smart is a master manipulator, said his ex-wife in an exclusive interview with FOX 13 News. Debbie Mitchell talked about the character of her ex-husband, 56-year-old Brian David Mitchell, a former street preacher, who is scheduled for a competency hearing in court on Monday.

"Debbie was married to Brian for five years and she said he acted differently around other people than he did with his family.


"'He was one way in front of other people and another way behind closed doors,' said Mitchell, who was married to Brian from 1980 to 1985.


"Mitchell also said her ex-husband was controlling and abusive.


"'What Brian does is he gets you to trust him, and then he gets you to love him, then he gets you to obey him, and then he gets you to follow him,' she said.


"Debbie said Brian sexually abused their two children and also her three other children from a previous marriage. She said she documented everything that happened.


"'I reported to four different agencies, plus the doctors knew,' she said. 'They were very well aware that my little 18-month-old was being molested because of what she was doing.'


"She said she eventually disobeyed Brian. Their marriage then ended up in a divorce in 1985. Debbie said on the day of her divorce, Brian married Wanda Barzee, who later became his alleged accomplice in the kidnapping of Smart.


"When Smart was kidnapped in 2002, Debbie said she knew it was Brian and had her former bishop call the Smart family. Smart was discovered nine months later on State Street in Sandy and police arrested Mitchell and Barzee.


"Mitchell has since then been declared incompetent and faces a hearing in federal court on Monday about his mental state and whether he should be forced to stand trial. Mitchell at numerous hearings has sang in court and has been asked multiple times to leave.


"Debbie said she thinks her ex-husband's singing in court is all an act and that he is a master manipulator.


"'He can get away with that and he's chosen to do that because he knows if he sings they're gonna tell him to go out, which I don't understand why they let him do that this many times,' she said. 'If any other person had done that they would have nipped it.'


"Last week, Mitchell's estranged wife, Wanda Barzee, pleaded guilty to the 2002 kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart and apologized to the Smart family. She struck a plea deal bargain with federal prosecutors that will likely give her a sentence of 15 years in prison with credit for the six years she has already been behind bars.


"Smart testified against Mitchell in his competency hearing last month, describing how she was taken from her bedroom in 2002 and held captive for nine months by the homeless street preacher and his wife. She described a daily ordeal of sexual assault and manipulation by Mitchell, who considered himself a 'prophet' and sought to make Smart a polygamous wife.


"Smart was ultimately returned to her family in 2003 when she was spotted walking down State Street in Sandy in the company of Mitchell and Barzee. Now 21, Elizabeth Smart is currently serving a mission for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in France.


"FOX 13's Bob Evans has more.


"SEND US YOUR NEWS, WEATHER AND SPORTS PICTURES! www.fox13now.com/pics


"FOLLOW US ON TWITTER! @fox13now"
 
The problem is that what sexual addiction does to people. It's worse when they molest children. Mitchell should have been excommunicated from the LDS Church, but he also should have done jail time for the molestations. When he kidnapped and raped Elizabeth Smart, Satan reared his ugly head. People should believe the victims and take immediate action. When no acion was taken, this was the result.
 
Mitchell should be locked up and thrown away the key.

ALREADY, LAWYERS/VULTURES WANT TO MAKE MONEY OFF OF THE "CONDEMNED"

Nancy Ding-a-ling-a-ling-ling Cunt Garrido now wants her former attorney, Gilbert Maines, reinstated.

Maines' goal wasn't probably to have Nancy Garrido released or have a lesser sentence. He wanted money. More than he can get from private practice.

To prevent reversal, Nancy Garrido should have a conflict-free attorney who can do his or her best to defend her.That might be impossible, but if she wants a lesser sentence, she should fess up, and testify against Creepy Phillip Garrido.

I FEEL SYMPATHY FOR MITCHELL'S ATTORNEYS, BUT NOT THEIR POSITIONS

Now Mitchell's attorneys want out of the case. The public statement is that they have a conflict with a Government witness. The real reason, which can't be heard by the Jury, is that can't work with Mitchell. Mitchell is obstructing his own defense, because if he can continue his fake claim of mental illness, then he'll remain in a mental institution until "he is cured". 

Then he'll be back to panhandling on the streets of Salt Lake City again.

Then it would be somebody else's daughter.

Then THE LIFE OF PRESIDENT THOMAS S. MONSON WOULD BE IN DANGER. (It may still not happen, but this can be explained.)

When Mitchell was about to kidnap Elizabeth Smart, one of his statements was to get rid of the "Antichrist" in Salt Lake City, which would have been the Late President Gordon B. Hinckley. 

He vetted his opposition to Pres. Hinckley, not because of what he said, but what Mitchell wanted. He wanted to write his own scripture to justify one of his addictions. He has not only a drug and alcohol addiction, but one addiction that was mentioned on the Oprah Winfrey Show with Dr. Drew Pinsky that was aired on November 23, 2009:

SEX!

It started with bad parenting by his "social worker" dad. You don't give your kid pornography to look at, but Shirl Mitchell did.

At 16, Brian Mitchell exposed himself. He should have been excommunicated then.

At about 19, he fathered a child out of wedlock, but he then married his girlfriend.

At the same time, he got hooked on drugs and alcohol. He should have been excommunicated then.

During his first two marriages, he molested his children. He should have been excommunicated then.

When he has a sexual addiction, it should have been nipped in the bud when he was a teenager, but when not nipped, it leads to the course that led to the kidnapping and rape of Elizabeth Smart. In some States, but not in California, he could get off with "diminished capacity", aka the "Twinkie Defense". It was that defense that led to riots in San Francisco after Former Supervisor Dan White was convicted of "involuntary manslaughter" for assassinating Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk. It was also part of the reason why Proposition 8 in 1982 was passed in California.
 
Drug, alcohol, and sex addictions are not an excuse for one to do crimes. Mitchell's course of actions were of his own doing. He is still capable of repentence, but he dug himself way too deep that he has to get First Presidency he despises to grant him permission to be rebaptized.
 
As for his criminal case, he has been such an obstructionist pig, not even O. J. Simpson's "Dream Team" or Scott Peterson's lawyer could save him. In fact, Scott Peterson's lawyer couldn't save Scott Peterson. 
 
If Mitchell wants to save himself and expect mercy fom the Court, he should end his hymn-singing, and plead guilty to the charges. If not, there's always Leavenworth. His last address. His lawyers could try to save him, but that requires cooperation wth Mitchell. I do have sympathy for the lawyers to the impossible, but I don't have sympathy for Mitchell.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

SCHNEIDER WITHHOLDING DOCUMENTS? SOUNDS LIKE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

From Walter L. Ellis:


Re: Schneider National Carriers, Inc., v. Walter L. Ellis, San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS 906308 / W/C case # ADJ6624664
Dear Sir:
On 1/13/09 after filing above DOT Complaint, LUKE took documents, including my log books in the Drivers lunch room.  I was later injured (broken rib, and knee injury) by BRANDON while attempting to escape from building.  Luke later fired me stating," Walter you are being fired for log book violations and refusing a load on 1/12/09". The DOT complaint was posted on: http://www.truckerscomplaint.com/  1/12/09.
a.     You are attempting to diminish my discovery in the Worker’s Compensation claim against Schneider.
b.     To stifle any attempt in my efforts to sue Schneider for assault and battery, discrimination, and unfair business practices

                            Regarding Post-Termination Injury 1/13/09 SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, SNI

On 1/13/09 while on duty at SCHNEIDER’S terminal located at 14392 Valley BL, Fontana, CA, I was confronted by Jeff Ames and Luke Siminendinger, Supervisors for SNI demanding that I complete my log books in a private meeting in their office.  This demand was being made in the presence of other drivers who were bringing their faulty logs up to date in the lunch room.  Luke demanded that I not finish my lunch, snached my log books from me and demanded that I follow he and Jeff to the office.  Luke stated the log books were the property of the DOT and he had a right to take them.
      Since being injured I have been denied treatment for the serious injuries I received on 1/13/09 and compounded by Mental Stress, which both I am being treated presently. The injuries I received to this day cause spasms on my right side, where my #9 rib was separated from the cartilage. The Stress I suffer is due to the discriminatory manner in which I was treated before and after being injured.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: David Imoto
To: uedcinc@aol.com
Sent: Wed, Nov 18, 2009 8:00 am
Subject: RE: Missing documents to be produced

Mr. Ellis:
 
Please note that as Ms. Robyn Neighbor advised you yesterday, we will be drafting a Motion to Quash your subpoena as we think that your request is overly broad, and does not lead to discoverable information.
 
Please remember, the trial that we are in the process of is on the limited issue of whether you were injured at work.  That is it!  You appear to want to litigate your termination and whether it was wrongful or not.  That is separate issue.  It cannot be heard at trial until it is determined if you were even injured at work.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I do want to litigate the Wrongful Termination.  The Judge agreed.  Harvey testifyed under oath that I was being Terminated for Log book violations, and for refusing a load. (Harvey's testimony attached). 
Your refusal to produce the rquested log books and copies are in violation of the judges orders.  Walter Ellis  11/18/09
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 
It appears as though you need to discuss this matter with the Information and Assistance Officer again.  Please make an appointment with her and advise her of the documents you are attempting to obtain.  Perhaps she can give you more direction and focus your search.
 
Should you have any additional questions or comments, do not hesitate to contact me.
 
Sincerely,
 
David H. Imoto, Esq.
 
Harrison, Eichenberg & Murphy
140 S. Chaparral Court, Ste 250
Anaheim Hills, CA 92808
(714) 685-7842
(714) 685-7846 - Facsimile

DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED:
 
Attorney Imoto,
It is required by DOT that copies of log books be kept and produced to DOT for inspection. Numerous pages were missing, including 1/12/09, the date that Mr. Simendinger stated in sworn testimony that he based his dicision to terminate me due the hours I had remaining on the 12th. These and other items I have yet to receive.
 
1. All copies of log books done in the name of Walter L. Ellis for the period between October 6, 2008, and January 13, 2009.
 
2. All log books done in the name of Roger Cleary for the period between October 15, 2008, and November 15, 2008.
 
3. All copies of Qualcomm messages to and from Truck No. 40649 between October 15, 2008, and November 15, 2008.
 
4. All log books done in the name of Roger Halterman for the period between November 18, 2008, and January 13, 2009.
 
5. All log books done by all drivers who were present in the office, lunch room, T. V. room, fuel desk, and lot area at Schneider National Carriers in Fontana, California between 10:00 a. m., and 12:30 p. m. on January 13, 2009.
 
6.All phone numbers of office personnel who were present in the office, lunch room, T. V. room, fuel desk, and lot area at Schneider National Carriers in Fontana, California between 10:00 a. m., and 12:30 p. m. on January 13, 2009.
 
7.All copies of Qualcomm messages to and from Walter L. Ellis between October 15, 2008, and January 13, 2009.
 
8. All recordings made with or without Applicant’s permission by all Schneider personnel, “DBL’s”, Workers Compensation Officials, and Liberty Mutual that are in the possession of  Schneider National Carriers,
 
REASONS WHY APPLICANT NEEDS THE DOCUMENTS:
            Applicant needs the documents listed on Page 1 to prove that he was injured, harassed, and discriminated against by Schneider and their Supervisors, and other employees.

http://www.truckerscomplaint.com/  

http://justiceforblacks.blogspot.com/

http://unitedaffirmativeactiondevelopment.com/

http://schneidertreatblacks.blogspot.com/

http://uedcdwb.blogspot.com/

http://www.twitter.com/TruckersComplnt

http://www.twitter.com/hankram

http://www.uaad.org/ 

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

DEATH THREATS TO PHILLIP GARRIDO'S PAROLE OFFICER; WHY? HE DIDN'T DO HIS JOB.

Phillip Garrdo's Parole Officer and his family are going through hell now. Why?

THE PAROLE OFFICER DIDN'T DO HIS JOB!

For example, Garrido's Parole Officer:

1. Didn't check the wires leading to the secret compound.

2. Didn't go into the secret compound.

3. Didn't barge in and search Garrido's property.

4. Didn't ask Garrido's brother if he had any children.

5. Didn't talk to Garrido's neighbors.

6. Didn't call the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office about Garrido.

7. Didn't take Garrido to Drug Rehab.

8. Didn't refer Garrido to mental health counseling.

9. Didn't check Garrido's rap sheet and Court records.

My biggest beef is the Department's excuse of "we didn't get any training about parole searches". FUCK! Both the United States Supreme Court have ruled that parole searches are constiutional, and the California Legislature specifically authorized it. It is clear that they ought to stop listening to their legal department, and start listening to the public and common sense.

Seriously, the Parole Agent's family should get police protction, but if it had to take two UC Policewomen to stop Garrido, then the California Department of Corrections is in deep shit. It all comes under the category of

HOODA THUNKED?!!!

IT IS SCHNEIDER WHO SHOULD TURN TAIL AND RUN LIKE THE BUNCH OF PUSSIES THAT THEY ARE

Here is the letter Mr. Ellis wrote to lawyers for Schneider National Carriers:

.The special motion "may" be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or,
 in the court's discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper. Code of Civil Procedure 425.16(f)
 
November 17, 2009
David S. Binder
 
Re: Schneider National Carriers, Inc., v. Walter L. Ellis, San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS 906308.
Dear Sir:
In respect to your previous letter, I ask you this question. Are you going to dismiss your frivolous Complaint?
Why should I drop my Motion when you and your firm filed this suit to:
a.     Diminish any recovery in my Worker’s Compensation claim against Schneider.
b.     To stifle any attempt in my efforts to sue Schneider for assault and battery, discrimination, and unfair business practices.
c.     Diminish my allegations that I was actually injured when IT WAS ONE OF SCHNEIDER’S GOONS, LONG-NAME BRANDON, WHO CAUSED INJURIES TO MY RIB, NECK, KNEE, ETC.
d.     Clearly an attempt to prevent me from publicizing on my web sites, Schneider’s injuries on me, Schneider’s discrimination, and Schneider’s treatment of its employees; especially when they make its drivers drive more than 11 hours a day, and work more then 14 hours a day. I guess Schneider does not give a damn about vehicular and pedestrian safety.
I will not respond to discovery until my Motion and subsequent appeal has concluded. In fact, I will give you telephonic notice that I will file the Ex-Parte Application to allow me to file the Special Motion to Strike. Otherwise, your Complaint is frivolous, and after the case is dismissed, I will sue Schneider and your firm for Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process.
I honestly beseech you to consider the fact that since I was actually injured, the suit clearly has no merit. In fact, repeating the mantra “I was not injured”, will result in me sending letters to request you to withdraw your Motions and Oppositions, since I have the medical evidence to prove it.
Drop your suit.
Sincerely yours
,Walter L. Ellis      WLE:wle
.The special motion may be filed within 60 days of the service of the complaint or, in the court's discretion, at any later time upon terms it deems proper.

Clearly, Schneider filed their to stop this man from publicizing his injuries, and harassment against him on his web sites. If Schneider gets away with this, ALL BLOGGERS WILL BE BLACKMAILED WITH FRIVOLOUS LAWSUITS GETTING THE BLOGGERS TO QUIT BLOGGING. It is as if the Gestapo instead tore up Anne Frank's Diary on August 4, 1944.

The lawyers at Tharpe & Howell should not have bar licenses, let alone be admitted into O'Malley's Bar. 

BLOGGERS OF THE WORLD UNITE! PASS THIS ON!

http://www.truckerscomplaint.com/  

http://justiceforblacks.blogspot.com/

http://unitedaffirmativeactiondevelopment.com/

http://schneidertreatblacks.blogspot.com/

http://uedcdwb.blogspot.com/

http://www.twitter.com/TruckersComplnt

http://www.twitter.com/hankram

http://www.uaad.org/